AlphaJuri
A αlphajuri compra o RPV de honorários que você já ganhou. Análise em minutos, proposta em até 48h e dinheiro na sua conta em até 72 horas. Sem dívida, sem cartório, sem regresso.
Clareza jurídico-financeira
The Proposal Arrives in Writing
In an RPV fee anticipation, the offer is a document — not a number said on a call. What the written proposal names, what holds it up legally, and the deadlines attached to it.
In short
A written proposal is the document that closes the analysis stage of an RPV fee anticipation: it identifies the receivable, states the amount the firm receives, fixes the payment deadline and lists the conditions under which the offer stands.
- Writing, not conversationThe offer only exists as a document a lawyer can read, compare and refuse.
- Four named elementsReceivable, amount, payment deadline and conditions — all on the same page.
- Assignment, not lendingThe operation runs under the Civil Code rules on assignment of receivables, arts. 286 to 298 [11].
- Deadlines in the textAnalysis in minutes, proposal in up to 48 hours, money in the account in up to 72 hours.
What a written proposal is
A written proposal is the document that closes the analysis stage of an RPV fee anticipation. It identifies the receivable the firm already won, states the amount the firm receives, fixes the payment deadline and lists the conditions under which the offer stands. It arrives in writing because the operation it describes is an assignment of receivables — a transfer of ownership — and a transfer needs a text that the lawyer can read, compare with another offer and refuse without consequence.
At AlphaJuri the sequence is fixed: analysis in minutes, proposal in up to 48 hours, money in the account in up to 72 hours. The analysis itself is free and carries no commitment; the lawyer sends the case number and the OAB registration, and a specialist responds within 48 hours [9]. Response and proposal are not the same object: the first is contact, the second is the document, and only the document can be compared, kept or signed. Nothing in that sequence happens by verbal agreement.
- The receivable, identified by case number and issuing court.
- The amount the firm receives, stated as a figure.
- The deadline for payment counted from signature.
- The conditions that keep the offer valid.
What a verbal quote cannot do
A number said on a phone call is an estimate wearing the clothes of an offer. It travels well and holds nothing. In an operation where the asset is a judicially recognised fee and the counterparty is a public entity, the gap between estimate and offer is where misunderstanding lives. Three things a conversation structurally cannot deliver:
- No recordA figure spoken on a call leaves nothing to compare the next morning, and nothing to show a partner before a decision.
- No conditionsVerbal quotes skip the assumptions that hold the figure up: procedural status, required documents, the window in which the offer stands.
- No accountabilityOnly a written document can be held against the party that issued it, clause by clause.
A figure without a document is an estimate; a figure inside a document is a commitment.
What the document names
A proposal worth reading answers four questions on the same page. Which receivable is being bought — identified by case number, court and the decision that recognised the fee. How much the firm receives, as a net figure, not a range. When that amount lands, counted in hours from signature. And under what conditions the offer stands, including what happens if the procedural status of the receivable changes before the assignment is formalised.
That last item is not boilerplate, and the reason is general rather than tied to any single dispute. Fee questions move: in 2026 the Superior Court of Justice affected Theme 1.454 to the repetitive-appeals rite — the dispute over the scope of the fee waiver in art. 19, §1, I of Law 10.522/2002 — with an order suspending cases on the same question at second instance [6]. The example illustrates how procedural ground can shift while a receivable is being examined. It is not a condition AlphaJuri attaches to its proposals, and no causal link between that theme and any particular offer should be read into it.
The practical test is simple: read the document once, alone, without anyone on the line. If anything material still needs explaining by phone, it was not in the proposal.
The legal frame behind the text
The written proposal describes an assignment of receivables, governed by arts. 286 to 298 of the Civil Code. Under art. 295, in an onerous assignment the assignor answers to the assignee for the existence of the receivable at the time of the assignment; liability for the debtor's solvency is not automatic and depends on an express clause, under art. 296 [11].
Read that distinction carefully, because it is the whole architecture. The law separates does this receivable exist from will the payer pay. The first is verified in the analysis stage, before any offer is made. The second belongs to whoever buys the receivable — which is why the operation is a purchase and not a lending transaction. Assignments of this kind are typically formalised by the contract between the parties and typically leave solvency risk with the assignee, but what governs a specific operation is the clause set written into the specific document.
This is also why the proposal is written rather than negotiated out loud. An assignment transfers an asset. The document that precedes it has to state what is being transferred, for how much, and on what terms — how the operation works is not a matter of trust between two voices.
The deadlines attached to the offer
Three times define the operation, and the proposal sits in the middle of them. Analysis in minutes: eligibility of the receivable is checked as soon as the case number and the OAB registration arrive. Proposal in up to 48 hours: the written offer is prepared and sent. Payment in up to 72 hours: the amount reaches the firm's account after signature. Alongside those, one further deadline is worth naming on its own: a specialist responds within 48 hours of the request [9]. Response time and proposal time are measured separately, and any counterparty should be asked which of the two a quoted deadline refers to.
A proposal also has a validity window, and it should say so. The reason is mechanical, not commercial: the figure rests on the procedural status of the RPV on the day it was analysed. If that status changes, the figure is recalculated — and a document with a stated window is how both sides know whether they are still looking at the same operation.
AlphaJuri describes its flow as one without debt and without notary steps for the firm. What any individual operation requires of the lawyer is stated in the document itself, which is one more reason to read it alone before signing.
How AlphaJuri sends it
The firm sends the case number and the OAB registration through the contact page. Eligibility of the receivable is checked in minutes. A specialist responds within 48 hours of that contact, free of charge and with no commitment attached to the analysis [9]; the written proposal is the document that follows. If it is accepted and signed, the amount reaches the account in up to 72 hours.
The document names the receivable, the amount, the deadline and the conditions. It describes a purchase of a receivable, not a lending product — and the clauses that define each side's position, including the solvency rule in art. 296, are there to be read rather than assumed [11].
That is the entire argument for the written proposal: it is the only form in which an offer can be checked, compared and kept. For firms weighing anticipation of recognised fees, the question to ask any counterparty is short — send it to me in writing.
FAQ
Does a written proposal bind the lawyer to accept it?
No. The analysis is free and carries no commitment, and a specialist responds within 48 hours of the request [9]. The proposal that follows is an offer: the firm reads it, compares it and decides. Only signature moves the operation forward.
What information does AlphaJuri need to produce the proposal?
The case number and the OAB registration. With those, eligibility of the receivable is verified and the written proposal is prepared [9]. Supporting documents may be requested to confirm the decision that recognised the fee.
Is this a lending operation?
No. It is a purchase of the receivable, structured as an assignment under arts. 286 to 298 of the Civil Code. Art. 295 provides that, in an onerous assignment, the assignor answers for the existence of the receivable at the time of the assignment, while liability for the debtor's solvency depends on an express clause under art. 296 [11]. Whether a given contract contains such a clause is a question answered by reading the document before signature.
How long does the proposal stay valid?
The document states its own window. The figure rests on the procedural status of the RPV on the day it was analysed, so a change in that status means the operation is recalculated rather than silently maintained.
Can the proposal change after signature?
The amount and the payment deadline stated in the signed document are the terms of the operation. Conditions listed in the text — such as confirmation of documents or of the receivable's procedural status — are resolved before signature, not after.