Prazo como argumento
The question has three exact answers at AlphaJuri: analysis in minutes, a proposal within 48 hours, and money in the lawyer's account within 72 hours. Here is what runs inside each of those times — and why most timelines you find online are estimates, not commitments.
"How long does this take" has three fixed answers in the AlphaJuri flow: analysis in minutes, a proposal within 48 hours, and money in the lawyer's account within 72 hours, for the purchase of RPV fees the lawyer has already won.
How long does this take? Three answers, in order: analysis in minutes, proposal within 48 hours, money in the account within 72 hours. Those are the times that govern the purchase of RPV fees a lawyer has already won. They are not averages collected from past operations and they are not a range. They are the deadlines the operation commits to.
Most answers to this question on the internet work differently. Type the phrase into a search box and you get a calculator: a quantity divided by an average speed, returning a number. That is arithmetic, and arithmetic is useful for what it measures. It is not a counterparty telling you when something will be done. In a financial operation the difference is the whole point: one is a projection, the other is responsibility.
The analysis is fast because the hard part is already done. The fee was recognized. The Requisição de Pequeno Valor exists. The debtor is a public entity. Nothing in the analysis depends on building an argument, convincing a judge, or waiting for a hearing to be scheduled.
What the analysis reads is what is already on the record: the requisition, the entity that owes it, and the lawyer's position as holder of the fee. That is a document check, and document checks are measured in minutes, not in weeks.
This is also why the first time is the shortest of the three. The minutes answer one question — is this an RPV fee that can be purchased — and stop there. The money question comes next, in the proposal.
Published durations fail for predictable reasons, and it is worth naming them before trusting any number, including ours. A timeline is only as firm as the things it depends on.
A deadline you can plan around names the hour and names who answers for it.
Within 48 hours of the analysis, the lawyer receives a proposal: a value for the RPV fee, stated in full, with the terms of the purchase. No conditions discovered later, no figure that moves after acceptance.
A proposal is a decision point, not a stage of waiting. You read it, compare it with the official payment calendar you are currently sitting in, and decide. If the answer is no, nothing happens — there is no obligation created by receiving a number. That is a structural consequence of buying a receivable instead of lending against it.
How the waiting time you avoid relates to the value you are offered is a separate question, and we treat it separately in how waiting time shapes the deságio in a fee advance. The step-by-step of the operation, from document check to transfer, is documented in how it works.
Within 72 hours, the amount is in the lawyer's account. The third time closes the sequence that the first two opened, and it is the one the whole model exists to deliver.
It is short because nothing in the operation requires a third party to move. There is no notary step. There is no guarantor to locate. There is no recourse clause that sends the operation back to the lawyer if the public entity pays late — once the fee is purchased, the waiting belongs to us.
That is also the honest limit of the three times. They cover the purchase: analysis, proposal, payment. They do not and cannot shorten the date on which the public entity settles the requisition. What they do is remove the lawyer from that queue.
AlphaJuri buys the RPV of fees the lawyer has already won. It is not a loan, there is no debt on the office's books, there is no notary, and there is no recourse. The office receives the value of work already delivered and judged, on a calendar it controls, instead of one set by a public entity's payment schedule.
The three times are the product as much as the money is. Analysis in minutes tells you quickly whether the operation is possible. Proposal within 48 hours gives you a number to decide on. Payment within 72 hours turns that decision into cash flow — payroll, rent, the next case — without the office financing itself out of its own patience.
If you hold a recognized fee in an RPV and want to know what it is worth today, start on the AlphaJuri homepage or open a conversation through the contact page. The first answer takes minutes.
Analysis in minutes, proposal within 48 hours, money in the lawyer's account within 72 hours. Those three times describe the AlphaJuri flow for the purchase of RPV fees already recognized.
No. AlphaJuri buys the RPV of fees the lawyer already won. There is no debt created, no notary step and no recourse against the lawyer if the public entity pays on its own schedule.
No. The official payment of the requisition follows the public entity's calendar. What changes is that the lawyer is paid for the receivable within 72 hours instead of waiting for that date.
They are part of the judicial calendar in general — the STJ, for example, admitted Theme 1.454 under the repetitive-appeals rite, on the scope of the waiver of Fazenda Nacional fees, and ordered second-instance cases on that specific question to be stayed [6]. That decision concerns a different matter and says nothing about requisitions already issued. What AlphaJuri examines is a fee already recognized in an RPV, and the answer on whether the purchase is possible comes in minutes.
Because most of them are formulas, not commitments: they divide a quantity by an average and return a number nobody has agreed to meet. A deadline is different — it names the hour and names who answers for it. That is why AlphaJuri states three: minutes, 48 hours, 72 hours.